| Pages: [1] |
1. Can someone confirm - escalation... - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
Ok thanks. I see. You get different escalations in low or null and hence different rats or loot (or at least the probabilities are different in different places).
- by Sea Sharp - at 2011.04.23 16:18:00
|
2. Can someone confirm - escalation... - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
Originally by: Wedding Peach I've completed a number of escalations and I have yet to have one that dropped ANY loot. Really? I usually get something... only craptastic something mostly lol.
- by Sea Sharp - at 2011.04.23 13:12:00
|
3. Can someone confirm - escalation... - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
Can someone please confirm for me that it is where an escalation starts, not where it ends, that primarily determines how good the loot is? For example, starts in high sec, final stage is in low sec = crap loot, starts in low sec, final stage is i...
- by Sea Sharp - at 2011.04.23 12:53:00
|
4. Dynamic Agent Quality - coming to TQ - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
Damm. The answer was staring me in the face all along! Simply put more high quality level 4 agents around high-sec. Mission-hub lag solved... and pretty much as it used to be. No. I'm not going to go run missions in low sec because the quality is ...
- by Sea Sharp - at 2011.04.20 19:57:00
|
5. L3s and L4s - the figures - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
Quote: My intention is to AFK as much as possible, and to blitz the missions You mean your intention is to bot?
- by Sea Sharp - at 2011.03.29 17:18:00
|
6. Something broken? No scan results... - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
Edited by: Sea Sharp on 12/03/2011 13:53:27 Edited by: Sea Sharp on 12/03/2011 13:51:14 I've scanned eight systems so far and not a single scan result - no wormholes, nothing. This is extremely unusual for my region. Is something broken or...
- by Sea Sharp - at 2011.03.12 13:48:00
|
7. Wormholes - Full! - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
Good advice death. I don't have access to 0.0; at least not the kind of access that would allow me to get organised and into a decent WH with the required ships. Ok I could do class 1's or 2's with a zealot and single scanning frig, but I'd quite ...
- by Sea Sharp - at 2009.11.16 18:03:00
|
8. Wormholes - Full! - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
So I've been scanning down and checking out wormholes recently and noticed that most of them (actually all of them, out of the 15 or so I found) are either already in use (onlined POS in system) or exploited (no sites left). Has half the Eve unive...
- by Sea Sharp - at 2009.11.16 01:19:00
|
9. Minimum effective standings? - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
Originally by: Gouverneur Originally by: Sea Sharp Wierd. I cancelled research with an old level 2 agent and I guess that must have declined a mission, because my standings went down. Only I didn't see that until I re-logged. So no...
- by Sea Sharp - at 2009.11.14 10:27:00
|
10. Minimum effective standings? - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
Originally by: Sinful Injustice Quote: "You need a minimum effective corp standing of at least 4.80, in addition to an effective faction, corp or personal standing of at least 6.80 to use this agent" The opperative words here are...
- by Sea Sharp - at 2009.11.13 22:18:00
|
11. Minimum effective standings? - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
Wierd. I cancelled research with an old level 2 agent and I guess that must have declined a mission, because my standings went down. Only I didn't see that until I re-logged. So now my standings are a bit below 6.8, which is why I couldn't use the...
- by Sea Sharp - at 2009.11.13 22:05:00
|
12. Minimum effective standings? - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
Can someone please explain to me what this means: "You need a minimum effective corp standing of at least 4.80, in addition to an effective faction, corp or personal standing of at least 6.80 to use this agent" I have a standing to the corp in q...
- by Sea Sharp - at 2009.11.13 21:53:00
|
| Pages: [1] |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |